Awards: 2005 Institute Honor Award for Regional and Urban Design
Recipient: Frank Schlesinger Associates Architects--Frank and Christy Schlesinger (left to right)
Representative Work: 3336 Cady’s Alley; Washington, D.C.
Project: Cady's Alley; Washington, D.C.
Firm: Sorg & Associates PC, with Frank Schlesinger Associates Architects; McInturff Architects; Martinez & Johnson Architecture PC; Shalom Baranes Associates Architects; and Landscape Architect The Fitch Studio
Client: Eastbanc Inc.; Washington, D.C.
Photo: Julia Heine
 

   
 
  AIA Home :: Article
 
 
 

Become a Member
Renew Your Membership
Careers
Contract Documents
Architect Finder
Find Your Local Component
Find Your Transcript
Soloso

Knowledge Communities
AIA Library and Archives
Related Web Sites
Become a Member
AIA eClassroom
 
   
Danish Modern: Then And Now (COD)
Copenhagen, Denmark
August 31 -September 4, 2008
 
AIA Project Delivery Workshop for Government and Corporate Facility Decision Makers
Park City, UT
September 9, 2008
 
Schools in A Flat World (CAE)
Helsinki, Finland
September 10 - 13, 2008
 
Web Seminar: Design Build Contract Forms, Legal Risks, Legislation and Roles
, United States of America
September 16, 2008
 
Traditional Building Exhibition and Conference
Chicago, IL
September 18 - 20, 2008
 
View Calendar
 
 
 
 |  

Realize Your Team's Highest Potential With Integrated Project Delivery

On November 5, 2007, the AIA introduced Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide (IPD Guide). Developed jointly with the AIA California Council, the IPD Guide helps define the world of IPD as the design and construction industry moves toward more effective and collaborative team approaches.

Technological evolution and owners’ ongoing demand for more effective processes that result in better, faster, less costly, and less adversarial construction projects are driving significant and rapid change in the construction industry. Envision a new world where

  • Facilities managers, end users, contractors, and suppliers are all involved at the start of the design process.
  • Processes are outcome-driven and decisions are not made solely on a first-cost basis.
  • All communications throughout the process are clear, concise, open, transparent, and trusting .
  • Designers fully understand the ramifications of their decisions when the decisions are made.
  • Risk and reward are value-based and appropriately balanced among all team members over the life of a project .
  • The industry delivers a higher-quality and more-sustainable built environment.

This is the world of IPD, which leverages the contribution of knowledge and expertise through early collaboration and use of new technologies, allowing all team members to better realize their highest potentials while expanding the value they provide throughout the project life cycle.

At the core of an integrated project are collaborative, integrated, and productive teams composed of key project participants. Building on early contributions of individual expertise, these teams are guided by principles of trust, transparent processes, effective collaboration, open information sharing, team success tied to project success, shared risk and reward, value-based decision making, and use of full technological capabilities and support. The outcome is the opportunity to design, build, and operate as efficiently as possible. Consider:

Traditional Project Delivery

Integrated Project Delivery

Fragmented, assembled on “just-as-needed” or “minimum-necessary” basis, strongly hierarchical, controlled

Teams

An integrated team entity composed of key project stakeholders, assembled early in the process, open, collaborative
Linear, distinct, segregated; knowledge gathered “just-as-needed”; information hoarded; silos of knowledge and expertise

Process

Concurrent and multilevel; early contributions of knowledge and expertise; information openly shared; stakeholder trust and respect
Individually managed, transferred to the greatest extent possible

Risk

Collectively managed, appropriately shared
Individually pursued; minimum effort for maximum return; (usually) first-cost-based

Compensation/ Reward

Team success tied to project success; value-based
Paper-based, 2-dimensional; analog

Communications/ Technology

Digitally based, virtual; building information modeling (BIM) (3-, 4-, and 5-dimensional)
Encourage unilateral effort; allocate and transfer risk; no sharing

Agreements

Encourage, foster, promote, and support multilateral open sharing and collaboration; risk sharing


The IPD Guide provides information and guidance on IPD principles and techniques and explains how to use IPD methodologies when designing and constructing projects. The guide responds to forces and trends at work in the design and construction industry today. It demonstrates that there is a better way to deliver projects, to transform the status quo (fragmented processes yielding outcomes below expectations) into a collaborative, value-based process delivering high-outcome results to the entire building team.

Benefits to architects include better communication on the critical issues facing practice today; a better process for working with clients, consultants, and builders; value-based compensation models; and appropriate sharing of risk and reward. More importantly, IPD increases the relevance of a profession that exceeds expectations, freeing architects to truly be designers again.

Significant cultural change will be required to achieve these outcomes. Insurance, legal, and educational models will have to change, as must basic practice tools and issues. The AIA is working closely with owners and contractors, including the Construction Users Roundtable, the General Services Administration, and the Associated General Contractors of America, to overcome these challenges.

Let your colleagues know about the IPD Guide and how this important industry shift can improve and streamline projects. To download a copy of the guide or to learn more, please visit www.aia.org/ipdg.