Awards: 2005 Institute Honor Award for Architecture
Recipient: Trahan Architects, A.P.A.C.
Project: Holy Rosary Catholic Church Complex; St. Amant, La.
Client: Holy Rosary Catholic Church; St. Amant, La.
Photo: Timothy Hursley
 

   
 
  AIA Home :: Five Questions (Plus One) to Ask When Hiring an Architect
 
 
 

Become a Member!
Renew Your Membership
Careers
Contract Documents
Architect Finder
Find Your Local Component
Find Your Transcript
Soloso

Small Project Practitioners
About Us
Advisory Group
SPP Journal Archive
Related Links
Small Firms
 
Knowledge Communities
AIA Library and Archives
Related Web Sites
Become a Member!
AIA eClassroom
 
 
Web Seminar: Healthcare Technology
, United States of America
May 20, 2008
 
Best 1: Building Enclosure Science and Technology
Minneapolis, MN
June 10 - 12, 2008
 
Biomimicry for a Sustainable Built Environment
Seattle, WA
June 11 - 13, 2008
 
Web Seminar: Healthcare 101 - Programming
, United States of America
June 17, 2008
 
Danish Modern: Then And Now
Copenhagen, Denmark
August 31 -September 4, 2008
 
View Calendar
 
 
 
 |  
 

Five Questions (Plus One) to Ask When Hiring an Architect

by Louis B. Smith Jr., AIA
 

Recently I decided to seek work in another part of the country. I have been working with several executive search agencies (or headhunters, as they're commonly known) that found out about me after I posted my resumé on the AIA jobs board (http://careercenter.aia.org). One of them asked me for five questions that I considered most important to ask when hiring an architect, in order of significance. I wasn’t expecting this and had no prepared answer, but I responded with what I thought to be the most important factors if I were hiring.

The exercise made me wonder: In any firm, would all the principals agree on the same five questions? What would the “correct” answers be? Would large and small firms have the same answers? Would the style or structure of the firm affect the questions thought to be most important? I have asked and answered my choice of questions below—and could not resist adding a sixth. (One more aspect of practice seemed worthy of mention: relationship management. This covers marketing, government relations, and even spousal relations. I can’t pretend to be excellent at the last, but I believe I am competent at the former.)

What would your questions and answers be? Write to me at spp@aia.org and let me know. If you agree with the questions but disagree with the answers, let me know that, too. We might have an enlightening discussion.

1. What are your values relative to the operation of an architecture firm?
Operating an architecture firm is a three-dimensional balancing act. The art, science, and business of architecture must all blend and interact to allow for growth, technical quality, and, ultimately, sufficient profitability to continue the business. Keeping all of these going requires a focus on the necessary resources, and all depend on one particular resource: staff. So keeping the staff coordinated, compensated, inspired, and technically competent is the core element of the business’s success. If these things are managed well, the art, the quality, and the profit will result. This is true in idea firms, production firms, and service firms, although the method of balancing will differ. Therefore, any firm that wants a continuing business with success among its clients must carefully maintain its staff resources.

2. How do you respond when unforeseen problems occur?
Douglas Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, had it right with his famous catchphrase, "Don't Panic." When I have conducted construction administration, I have had dozers cut through unmarked 500 pair phone cables on my project. (Fortunately they had been abandoned long before.) I have also had undocumented landfill sites turn up on a site (eventually moved to a proper landfill, paid for by the owner because the owner’s forces had created the site). The most important part of my response was not to panic. Rather, I collected information and thought through the issue as a design problem: What is the scope and nature of the problem? What urgently must be done? Who can do it? What else must be done? Who is responsible for paying for what? How can it be expedited? Who else is affected? What resources exist to direct toward the problem? What other questions do we need to ask? By responding to an unforeseen condition in this manner, the stakeholders can move together toward a timely resolution.

3. What is your ability to work in a team?
Everyone talks about the need for teamwork. I have learned, though, that team management requires two essential elements. First, the team leader must recognize that the team is stronger as a group than any one star individual. Consequently it is important to listen to the opinions of all team members. If a team member must be educated or corrected, the leader should do so carefully and promptly. The team is only as strong as its weakest member, so strengthening each member is of paramount importance. If the lowest-paid person makes a mistake, the highest-paid person is also responsible for that mistake. Second, the team leader must recognize that people’s perceptions are their reality. Team members might need perspective and context in order to pursue the common vision and understand how it is to be achieved. This makes the entire team more effective. Far from being a waste of time, it gives purpose and lends quality to efforts beyond the level of specific instruction. Quality improves when the lowest-paid person can find an error that a higher-paid person missed.

4. What is your familiarity with the technologies used for production?
The most important technology for creating and documenting a building is still a pen or pencil in the hand and a roll of trace. Yes, I am familiar with the 3D modeling programs as well as 2D CAD programs and building information modeling programs. I have even taught several of them (Vectorworks, AutoCAD, and Microstation). All of them are enhanced by a quick outline of how to structure the work and how to solve a detail issue. The pen and pencil is not the primary way to generate the set. It is the key to quality in allowing team members to talk about how to address a problem and to clarify the intent and result with each other. Sketches may be tested on a computer. However, the idea is the essence of the solution. The combination of visual and verbal communication is the essential technology for creating architecture. Most of the time, we don't build. We are in the business of information. We gather it, corral it, massage it, grow it, restructure it, and then pass it along to those who need to use it to create the building we have dreamed in our technical dream. If we do it well, we awake refreshed to new possibilities for our world. If we do it poorly, we create a waking nightmare for all involved.

5. What is your familiarity with building technology?
I have more familiarity with the problems that building technology is supposed to solve. The greatest of these is water management. More products seem to be generated in this area than any other, as well they should be. As architects, we come up with new configurations of construction to match some ideal. We then scale back the ideal to fit the available technology or suffer the resulting leaks and problems that result from misplaced moisture. Consequently, in my technology research, I have noted that you must always keep evaluating. Technology changes every day. The target is never still. I have also decided that the most important thing to know about any material is how it fails and what results. If you know how it fails, you can better understand its proper use and prevent its failure. For a building to be technologically sound, everything—even redundant systems—must work.

6. What is your ability to manage clients and other relationships outside the firm?
Effective client management follows the same principles as relationships inside the firm. Listen. Provide as much information as you can. Don't provide so much information that the client's expectations become unmanageable. Listen. Be honest. Make sure things are seen in context. Speak carefully. Remember that the other person has official and unofficial needs and requirements. Address those constraints. Listen. The mastery of these simple principles is an ongoing task. It is simple but not easy. Proficiency comes from practice and humility. Success comes from persistence and constant vigilance. Listen.

All the answers to these questions are manifested in my participation in the American Institute of Architects. I have been president of my local Huron Valley Chapter, which required a three-year service commitment for an unstaffed component. Nothing builds leadership like getting things done with volunteers. In the last two years I have been serving on the national level on the Advisory Group of the Small Project Practitioners Knowledge Community. I am slated to be chair of the group in 2007. The resources of the AIA are significant. Surely among the most important are the hundreds of volunteers across the country who, like me, are reshaping and reinventing the profession. I invite you to extend this conversation beyond those currently enrolled as AIA and extend to them an offer to join those of us dedicated to reinvention.