 |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 | Danish Modern: Then And Now (COD) Copenhagen, Denmark August 31 -September 4, 2008 | | | AIA Project Delivery Workshop for Government and Corporate Facility Decision Makers Park City, UT September 9, 2008 | | | Schools in A Flat World (CAE) Helsinki, Finland September 10 - 13, 2008 | | | Web Seminar: Design Build Contract Forms, Legal Risks, Legislation and Roles , United States of America September 16, 2008 | | | Traditional Building Exhibition and Conference Chicago, IL September 18 - 20, 2008 | | | | View Calendar | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
ISSUE BRIEFING
Small Project Practitioners
A Knowledge Community of the American Institute of Architects
July 14, 2006
Design Access for the Middle Class
Background
The availability of architects' services to improve housing is not
evenly available through American society. Lower-income citizens
who participate in affordable housing programs get the services of
an architect indirectly when they purchase or rent an apartment,
townhouse, or single-family home built in a government directed
program. The wealthiest citizens have sufficient cash to allow them
to secure the services of an architect with cash before a mortgage
is written. The middle class is generally unable to secure the
services of an architect without jeopardizing their equity
contribution to the process as the architects fees are not
considered equity. Worse, the fees cannot be amortized into the
mortgage as the contractors management fees are. Therefore,
middle-class homeowners do not have access to sustainable design
tailored to their sites and lifestyles.
Analysis
The mortgage policies of bank and other financial
institutions is heavily weighted toward compliance with secondary
market requirements. The secondary market consists primarily of the
FHA, VA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. These organizations place
restrictions on what can be included in a mortgage package that is
acceptable to them for purchase. While financial institutions are
welcome to write mortgages on any basis they like as long as they
do not expect to resell them on the secondary market, the reality
of the market is that this is done only in a very small number of
cases. The second level of the problem includes educating the
financial markets and institutions on a process of home
construction that starts with a brief preliminary program for
appraisal and includes a fixed cost of design as well as a fixed
construction budget as part of the mortgage package. Neither of
these items are troublesome for the architect, as industry practice
is to design to a budget and many architects are willing to work on
a fixed fee basis.
Proposed Solution
The first level of correction is to have the secondary
mortgage market address the inclusion of an architect's services
and fees in evaluating those mortgages to be bought. This does not
require any subsidy to architects and can be revenue neutral
concerning government support. The second level is to work with the
financial industry to educate and promote better design as a
mortgage value and include it in the mortgage process.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |