 |
 |
Richard
J. Schuster, MD, FACP
Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine
Wright State University School of Medicine
Medical Director
Sycamore Primary Care Center
Dayton, Ohio |
|
Marianne
L. Weber, AIA, NCARB
Vice President
E. Lynn App Architects, Inc.
Englewood, Ohio |
In today's
consumer-driven healthcare market, proactive consumers are demanding
convenience as well as quality. How an organization delivers service
is becoming as important as the clinical quality (Anderson 1991). As
healthcare organizations come to accept this reality, it is becoming
apparent that they must arm themselves with improved skills and resources
in order to meet these demands. "Mouthing slogans like 'the consumer
is king' is easy, but revamping your business to make it customer centered
takes more than platitudes . . . " (Appleby 1996). One area of knowledge
and skill that is proving useful with regard to quality of service and
design is that of management science.
Management
science is a field that melds portions of business, economics, statistics,
mathematics, and other disciplines in a pragmatic effort to help managers
make optimal decisions (Lapin 1994). Whenever an evaluation of hard
data can be helpful in reaching a decision, quantitative methods are
used to assist managers in selecting the best alternative course of
action that will help them in the pursuit of such organizational goals
as cost-effectiveness, quality service delivery, and profit.
While
good managers are often able to intuitively make reasonable decisions,
intuition alone is not always sufficient for selling an "idea" to one's
organization. It usually takes established precedents or hard data to
influence those with authority. Applying the appropriate quantitative
analytical tool to a given problem can produce the hard data needed
to influence decision making.
What
Are Quantitative Methods?
For healthcare managers and designers, two particular quantitative methods,
queuing theory and simulation, have applications that can direct decision
outcomes so as to maximize customer satisfaction and produce the optimum
design, both of which directly impact profitability.
Queuing
theory is one of the earliest quantitative methods, originating in a
1909 paper by A. K. Erlang, a Danish telephone engineer. The objective
is to determine how to provide service to customers in such a way that
an efficient operation is achieved. Retail businesses have historically
utilized queuing theory successfully to determine how best to design
delivery of service methods that will decrease waiting times and in
turn improve customer satisfaction. An analysis of significant data
can determine various characteristics of the queuing system such as
mean waiting time, components of the waiting time, and the mean length
of the waiting line. This information can be simply acquired and easily
analyzed with readily available spreadsheet software, and then used
to construct a cost analysis or determine how to achieve a targeted
level of satisfactory customer service. (Lapin 1994)
Simulation
is a quantitative procedure that describes a process; a series of organized
trial-and-error experiments are then conducted to predict the behavior
of the process in operation. Simulation helps to predict the issues
resulting from the variation that occurs day to day in the process due
to random chance. These simulations seek to duplicate reality as closely
as possible within practical limits. Consequently, those issues identified
can be addressed during planning activities with decisions being based
on realistic data. Given that simulations are often conducted via the
computer, a number of alternative operating policies can easily be modeled
such that the optimum situation can be identified (Lapin 1994).
© 2004 The American
Institute of Architects, All Rights Reserved.
1735 New York Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006
Phone 800-AIA-3837 Facsimile 202-626-7547 email
infocentral@aia.org
Legal
Notices
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
 |
|
|